Hi again, > >> However, if you look at the old code you'll see that we did use Buffers > >> even there. And copy from array into buffer and back. This is cleaned up > >> by this patch a little and also removed some copies and allocations. > >> I'll benchmark it this evening and see what comes out of it.
Doh! I just realized (by looking at the code, not by doing benchmarks) that the new code is indeed less efficient. I'll see if I can make it better or just shut up. Sorry for the noise. /Roman
