On 10/24/07, Robert Lougher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/23/07, Robert Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Robert Lougher schrieb: > > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > > > On 10/23/07, Vladimir Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have still problems to compile the GNU-Classpath 0.96.1 on the > > >> StrongARM machine. > > >> Once again, I would like to use it together with the JamVM 1.4.5, since > > >> both support now Java Annotations and Generics. > > >> > > If I understand this[0] page right EABI is not supported on StrongARM > > CPUs ... at least not with custom GCC patches. > > > > Yes, ARMv4 doesn't have the bx instruction. However, I I didn't know > it required a gcc patch. Interestingly, the patch is at odds with the > ARM APCS, which recommends bx instructions be subject to a relocation > directive, and be replaced at link time. > > Rob. >
On re-reading my reply I think I need to clarify. The ARM APCS has provisions for ARMv4, including StrongARM. If ifs recommendations are followed, it is compatble with the standard. Rob. ARM APCS: http://www.arm.com/pdfs/aapcs.pdf > > Regards > > Robert > > > > [0] - http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort > > >
