On 17/02/2008, Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed when trying to fix PR34840 that we have
> a lot of duplicate code between StringBuffer and
> StringBuilder. This patch abstracts most of it
> into a common superclass. Testing PR34840 showed
> that OpenJDK already does this.
>
> PR21869 is also then trivial, as we just need an
> additional Classpath string buffer that doesn't
> create a copy when toString() is called (as in
> GCJ).
>
> Comments? I'll commit Monday if there are no
> objections.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Support Free Java!
> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
> http://openjdk.java.net
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHt8KrAQUyfTZIWfoRAsD7AJ90RBSagUpL7Z4Ih68r+ekkAfmjkACfW6wF
> 6sCuK7cAJmyf+WonTYS5Rdk=
> =TWTG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
Committed.
2008-02-26 Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR classpath/21869:
* java/lang/AbstractStringBuffer.java: New class.
* java/lang/StringBuffer.java,
* java/lang/StringBuilder.java:
Changed to use AbstractStringBuffer.
--
Andrew :-)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
