>>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Mancke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sebastian> Now, the method getSimpleName() is merged with the one of
Sebastian> glibgcj. (Not changing behaviour, but avoiding recursion)
I noticed it is still different.
My recollection (I haven't looked at this in a while) is that the gcj
implementation is correct. And, it relies only on the published Class
API. So, why not just use it directly in Classpath's Class?
Sebastian> + String fullName = getName(klass);
Sebastian> + int pos = fullName.lastIndexOf("$");
I think relying on the name mangling is not valid.
That is why gcj's implementation uses isAnonymousClass and the like.
Tom
