On 16:26 Wed 12 Oct , Brian Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes > <ahug...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12:07 Wed 12 Oct , Ian Rogers wrote: > >> On 12 October 2011 03:52, Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 10:29 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes > >> >> <ahug...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> > If we're going to change that, it should happen after the next release > >> >> > and with plenty of discussion / heads up for VMs. > >> >> > >> >> Right. I guess I could send patches for JamVM, CACAO, and Jato as > >> >> well. Are there other VMs we care about? > >> > > >> > JikesRVM and GCJ of course! > >> > Although they only use part of the VM interface at this time. > >> > There is a somewhat full list at: > >> > https://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/stories.html#jvm > >> > Some of those are somewhat in "hibernation" though. > >> > Heay, and JATO is missing... > > > > If we're going to do this, it needs to wait until after the next release. > > When is that? >
I need to finish the fix for: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42390 and fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712013 Then we'll have a release, if there are no objections. Is anyone against moving the VM interfaces to 1.5 constructs post 0.99? Or adding 1.7 classes for that matter (which was discussed earlier)? > Brian -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://icedtea.classpath.org PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
