On 10/13/2012 02:50 AM, Ivan Maidanski wrote: > > May be it's time to change the policy of patch acceptance from "please find a > person who reviews (among 1 or 2 guys) your code" to "if signed FSF paper, > and you have patches, post them to ML, commit to some feature development > branch and, if no objections within 2-3 weeks, merge the branch to master, in > case of further objections revert the patches".
Sorry about that. There are quite a few people who can review patches, but we might need prompting. No reason why you shouldn't review patches too, but you should still have someone else look at them. It is true that it's better to accept a patch that looks basically OK than hold it back because no-one has time to go through it line-by-line. Please post a summary mail of the patches. Andrew.
