----- Original Message ----- > Hi Andrew, > > Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:02:52 -0400 (EDT) от Andrew Hughes > <ahug...@redhat.com>: > > Because he actually wants them to be included in GNU Classpath. > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Ivan Maidanski wrote: > > Can't understand. There are GNU Classpath development branches? > > I guess what Andrew is trying to say here is that I work against GNU > Classpath master and submit changes for review and inclusion very > aggressively. > > That pretty much avoids the problem you're having with a huge backlog > of > unreviewed changes. ;-) >
What am I saying is it's fine to develop on a branch, of course, but if you actually want the work included in a release, it has to be on trunk/HEAD/whatever. If you're familiar with how Linux is developed, it's like fixing it in one of the subsystem trees, or linux-next, but never asking Linus to pull it into his tree for the next release. > Pekka -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
