> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Aaron
> M. Renn
>
> John Keiser wrote:
> > You can add java.beans to the list. It's done and up to 1.1
compliance,
> > as far as I have tested it. I haven't run it with the BeanBox,
though.
> > I figure if we have something working, we may as well include it.
>
> How useful are beans without a working awt?
>
They are useful, just not *as* useful without the GUI. Invisible beans
exist, and it is possible to create a text-based bean development tool,
as well. I figure, if there's no reason to put it out, and it works,
why not leave it in?
> > java.lang.reflect is going to be totally overhauled for the VM
> > requirement. No more VM independence on it; there's really no need
for
> > it, since the VMs have to implement most of it internally anyway.
>
> What does this mean? You don't think reflection should be included?
>
No, it should be included. I'm just letting you know the actual status.
--John Keiser
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
