First off I think that it is spectacular that Kiev is going to be free software. Maxim deserves a lot of thanks for this. Second, I'd like for Classpath to support Kiev extensions that don't compromise 100% pure java compatibility. The special Kiev comments look like they will do the trick. I think our first priority still needs to be getting a first release that supports Japhar out the door. However, going forward it shouldn't be too much trouble to add in Kiev assertion statements at the beginning of most methods. We can go back later and add that to the existing classes. What exactly would you like to see us do to support Kiev specific features? I'm not familiar enough with the features of it to know for sure what items we would want to include. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Paul Fisher
- gnu vs. org.gnu: a possible useful distinction John Keiser
- Re: gnu vs. org.gnu: a possible useful dis... Aaron M. Renn
- RE: gnu vs. org.gnu: a possible useful... John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Brian Jones
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Paul Fisher
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Artur Biesiadowski
- RE: Free Java compiler - Kiev John Keiser
- Re: Free Java compiler - Kiev Maxim Kizub