Yeah, I need to work on this thing some more. For one thing I need to
use ClassTool against the JDK and use javap against GNU Classpath
(since ClassTool can't support a classpath specification or maybe we
can run it with Japhar now... hrm).
The 1.2 comparison is against 1.2 final.
Brian
Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many many moons ago, Brian Jones wrote:
> >
> > The results of the fixes to the script last night look great. I think
> > the results work well as an addition to the normal todo list and there
> > appear to be a few things to do in just about every main package
> > including java.io, java.lang, etc.
> >
> > http://www.classpath.org/~brian/compat/results-1.1.txt
> > http://www.classpath.org/~brian/compat/results-1.2.txt
>
> I thought I posted this once before but I can't find it in the archives
> anywhere - sorry if it's a repeat.
>
> How up-to-date are these results? And what version of the 1.2 API is
> tested for?
>
> Going to http://www.classpath.org/~brian/compat/ shows the dates on the
> results file as 02 and 03 Jan 1999. I'd be interested to see the results
> for the 0.0pre release.
>
> Also, these results seem to include some anonymous classes (like
> java.util.Collections$1...) which shouldn't be public (maybe javac makes
> them public, but they still shouldn't be part of the API). I'm not sure
> about various other inner classes that I thought were non-public, too.
>
> Thoughts?
> Stuart.
--
|-------------------------------|Software Engineer
|Brian Jones |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |http://www.nortel.net
|http://www.classpath.org/ |------------------------------
