OK, my parting thought:
It does seem that a lot of people and companies are using this naming
convention, which could make it a Good Thing, regardless of how screwed up
it is. But while we don't need to decide now, I think we *do* need to
decide before release.
--John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron M. Renn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 1999 8:00 AM
> To: Wes Biggs
> Cc: Classpath
> Subject: Re: org.gnu vs. gnu (was Re: Congratulations)
>
>
> Wow. This is the most discussion we've had on any topic in a long time
> around here. This is the most ridiculous thing to have a flame war about
> ever. So I'll pledge to stop right here. Everyone else can send
> one more message if they want to.
>
> The vast bulk of what we are writing is in the java.* namespace where it
> should be. The rest is in gnu.* I personally don't see any value added
> to making the change to org.gnu right now, given that maybe five people
> total are using this code. The vast majority if the gnu.* packages
> are not part of Classpath at all, but rather are programs other people
> wrote and donated to GNU.
>
> I'm not ready to slam the door on org.gnu, but right now my priority is
> actually getting code done and working.
>
> --
> Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
>
>
