Tom Tromey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Nic> What do the Classpath folks think of setting up a subversions > Nic> module called: > Nic> javax > Nic> where we put the code for javax stuff that it outside the Classpath > Nic> project. > > Why not put it in Classpath? I'm all for that. I have no objections to this. I think there was some reason that was discussed some time back about reasons not to include extensions directly in the Classpath archive. I think Paul was the person who came up with them though. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Bryce McKinlay
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion David Himelright
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Aaron M. Renn
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Mark Wielaard
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Paul Fisher
- javax.sound (Was: gnu.* namespace discussion) Mark Wielaard

