Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> As far as I can see, there is no real java.util.zip implementation in
> classpath yet, so do you agree if I just commit the content of jazzlib
> to the classpath repository, overwriting the three small existing
> classes?
That's fine. As you commit files, could you please go through them and
clean up the formatting some to match the rest of Classpath? From a
quick look over the source this morning, I'm referring to things like
spaces between method names and the following parens, and spaces between
keywords (if, etc) and their following parens.
> The other problem is the merge with libgcj as it already contains a
> working java.util.zip implementation based on CNI. However, the
> java.util.zip package wasn't merged yet, so there is no need to
> resolve this now.
I agree.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
