Hi!

On Mit, 17 Okt 2001 Eric Blake wrote:

--<snip>--
 
> What about the idea of both a Makefile and build.xml approach to
> building the .class files?  Then Ant users who just want classes.zip and
> already have a VM don't have to worry about make, but developers that
> care about the native code don't need to worry about Ant even for the
> .class files.  The only drawback of this dual approach is that
> ddevelopers must remember to list new .java files in two separate build
> framework files, instead of one.

New .java files shouldn't be a problem with Ant. It should find them
automatically in most cases.

Ciao,
Andreas

_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath

Reply via email to