Sascha wrote: >> (I really like some things in Lumberjack which I'd like to adapt, >> of course giving due credit. But the question basically applies >> to a lot of code, not only to Lumberjack).
Brian Jones wrote: > I really don't know, credit must be given always. If it is more than > 10 lines (total) of patch content then it probably falls under > the copyright assignment desired bit, or maybe can be handled like > gnu.java.math.MPN though I'm not sure when. If you mean ideas that > you reimplement then it probably doesn't matter. Sascha and I are expecting to discuss our designs extensively. Since both are open source, and since ideas that aren't patented can't be owned (and I don't think any patentable ideas are lurking in either code base :-), it seems to me that taking ideas from each other's code is clearly okay. Sascha, Were you expecting to take code, or were you planning (like I am) to learn from both sets of code and make changes to your code that you conclude are appropriate? Brian -- Brian R. Gilstrap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Husband and father, Tai Chi practitioner, Software architect Java developer, Macintosh User "Doubtless, like all of us, he was many men, turned on one or another of his selves as occasion required, and kept his real self a frightened secret from the world." --Will Durant _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
