John Leuner wrote: > > > I cleaned your patch up a bit, and once I get it to compile, I'm > > committing it. Thanks for the catch - I documented that the class > > specified by java.system.class.loader must now have a constructor which > > accepts a parent class loader. > > It wasn't really a patch, just a demonstration of the problem. > > Any reason why it wouldn't compile?
Yes - the patch as it appeared in my reply to your email was hastily written and untested (ie. I wrote the patch and replied to your email before starting the time-consuming compilation and regression testing process). I think the only change I had to make before committing it, however, was adding an import statement. And it has been in CVS for nearly a week now. -- This signature intentionally left boring. Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] BYU student, free software programmer _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
