>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Since gcj 3.1 is about to be released and gcj 3.0 can no longer Mark> compile the current Classpath from CVS I am going to commit the Mark> following workarounds. Thanks, Mark. I think it would make sense to mark the workarounds with a comment explaining they are needed for gcj 3.1. That way when gcj is fixed we can remove them, and when someone sees the code they will know why it is written in a strange way. Mark> Together with the patch provided in PR java/2791 for gcj this Mark> makes it possible to compile classpath with gcj again I'll try to get this approved asap. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
