Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:30:39 -0600: > > >I have a complaint about this patch to the Javadoc. [...] > > > >/** > > * In other words, both style 1: > > * <pre> > > * for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) > > * System.out.println(i); > > * </pre> > > * > > * and style 2: > ><pre> > >for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) > > System.out.println(i); > ><pre> > > * > > * should have the same result in the compiled documentation; > > * but I think style 1 is more consistent. > > */ > > I agree with Eric, so I'll eventually review my recent commits and undo > them as appropriate. However, I think it would be fine to do the release > with the Javadoc comments as they are in CVS. What do you think, Eric?
No, it doesn't matter for 0.04. I prefer style 1. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
