> > 722 ignore supported timeout... 2002-Nov-26 10:10 mark > > 728 fixes to sorting arrays 2002-Nov-26 11:08 jewel > > With no objections these patches will not be integrated before the > release.
Julian, do you have any more information about these patches? I looked at the various documentation for SO_TIMEOUT on my Debian system and didn't see any mention of it. But it also didn't say that it isn't supported. Is the patched behaviour necessary for JRVM to work correctly? I tried to generate a case where the current sorting routines break (by generating random sequences), but I never once got it to fail. Would it be difficult for you to repeat the process where you got Eclipse to fail? John Leuner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
