> Since I seem to be the only one that actually wants a VMClass
> instance, maybe we can agree on a slightly different interface.
> How about keep a reference to a VMClass instance in Class, but
> not calling any instance methods on VMClass, but using static
> methods instead (always passing the Class reference along).

I don't understand the purpose of holding a reference to an instance of a
class that only has static methods invoked on it.

What I don't want is to have a different VMClass instance per Class object.

Cheers,
David Holmes



_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath

Reply via email to