Sascha Brawer writes: > any opinions about what to do about Classpath Bug #7123? > > Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=7123 > > Would it be correct to amend the API documentation, saying that correct > results cannot be expected for input coefficients that have no exact > representation in IEEE 754?
Ideally gcj should provide a way to avoid the use of extended 80-bit precision on the x86. -- Brian Gough _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
