I would like the vmdata field type then to be VMClass not Object.
I disagree, as it imposes a restriction on what vmData actually is. The most obvious implementation of vmData is to be a byte[] instance holding the byte of a native pointer to an internal VM non-moveable data structure.
Etienne
-- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
