Hi, On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 21:46, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "David" == David Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> Besides, how do you know my compiler didn't give me the > David> information. ;-) > > Yeah, IMO this is a case where reverse engineering is appropriate and > required for interoperability. I don't think we have problems here.
Yes, sorry David if gave the impression that your help isn't welcome or that such a simple fact cannot be shared with the group. But I thought a friendly reminder in general about the Requirements section from the Hacker Guide wouldn't hurt. Before people might get the idea they could help the project by picking up the sources of some proprietary implementation and quoting significant sections from it on list whenever we have a discussion about what the most appropriate way is to implement something. (In general we want to have a better implementation than the proprietary one anyway!) Your presence on the list, insights, ideas and integration of GNU Classpath with OVM are really appreciated! Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
