Re: RFC: Require VM to provide JNI 1.2 support?

[Robert Lougher]

Yes, I agree.  I'll add JNI 1.4 support to the next release of JamVM, even 
if it's only the stubs.  This means any JNI code must have two 
implementations to be sure to work with any VM, even if they report they're 
1.4 compliant...

Any idea when Classpath 0.10 will be out?
Rob.
----Original Message Follows----
From: Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steven Augart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFC: Require VM to provide JNI 1.2 support?
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:09:04 +0200
Steven Augart wrote:
Steven Augart wrote:
Mark has suggested that it might be a good idea for the next release
of GNU Classpath to require that the VM provide JNI 1.2.  He's asked
me to post this Request for Comments on the idea.

Any objections to making it JNI 1.4 instead of JNI 1.2?
Sounds good for me.
cheers,
dalibor topic
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath