Hi, On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 02:53, Casey Marshall wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mark> First javax/net/ssl/HandshakeCompletedEvent.java and > Mark> javax/net/ssl/SSLSession.java use > Mark> javax.security.cert.X509Certificate. I don't know if we even > Mark> want to provide the javax.security.cert package since it is > Mark> obviously not needed by anyone (or is it?) > > I would not be surprised if there is code that uses that package, and > won't be (or can't be) updated. I think including it (since it's > already done and complete) is the safest thing to do. > > Also, none of these classes are actually marked as deprecated. Sun > just includes a warning that people should use java.security.cert > instead. It's more green in japitools, too ;)
O, more green in japitool! Yes, lets include it then. Yes, I see the point, and it looks like even though this is a bit of code duplication the implementation is so minimal that it will need not much (any) maintenance at all. But I still think our own code (HandshakeCompletedEvent and SSLSession) should use java.security.cert directly and not javax.security.cert. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
