Casey Marshall wrote: > Robert> After spending some time on ideas to fix this the following > Robert> came to my mind: > Robert> a) do the NaN,Infinity in Java and the rest in C > Robert> b) do both in C because its faster > Robert> c) provide a pure Java and a pure C version, making > Robert> JNode/... and real VMs equally happy > > I am a fan of (c), and in general I like it better if there is a pure > Java version first. I also don't tend to blindly believe that a C > version will be universally faster. > > Robert> c) seems to be my favorite for an umbrella project like > Robert> classpath but I dont know how I could make the two > Robert> implementations optional. Any ideas about this and my > Robert> proposal? > > I'd suggest doing a pure Java version, if it's difficult to provide > both. Classpath should be complete and correct, and that can be done > in most of the library in Java code only, and done simpler and > clearer.
Hear! Hear! (Sorry not to add anything meaningful, but I just had to voice my support.) Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
