[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I would like to make this new class public to do away with the > overhead (and initialization dependencies) of the security check, but > that would require some VM magic to make the class inaccessible from > untrusted code. Michael Koch (strongly) opposes this. How would you > feel about it?
Speaking as yet another JVM implementor, I'm against this idea for the reasons given by Michael and others. Sorry. -- Steve _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
