Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:39:12 +0200,
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2004 10:23 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck:
[...]
>> Yes, other worst alternatives exist. Also, note that GNU JAXP
>> release cycle is not the same as classpath; and if we really want a
>> separate module, I suppose it's possible to add some instructions
>> to the make dist target or something.
>
> The question is: Does GNU JAXP wants/needs an extra release cylce when
> its merged ? Personally I think thats a bad idea.
Not a different release cycle, but if some people wants GNU JAXP but not
all GNU CLASSPATH, maybe it could be kind to ship a separate module when
it has evolved.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
,= ,-_-. =.
((_/)o o(\_))
`-'(. .)`-'
\_/
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
