Am Dienstag, 9. November 2004 23:55 schrieb Grzegorz B. Prokopski:
> Hi all,
>
> I attached a patch that illustrates how we use the -revision switch
> of libtool to say we don't provide a stable binary interface,
> instead of hardcoded 0:0:0, as it's done currently in gnu cp.
> Short story is: -revision does exactly the thing that 0:0:0 hack is
> supposed to do.
>
> What you pass to -revision is another story. We pass Subversion
> revision number, but you may pass adequate CVS rev. no, or just
> stick to "0.11+cvs" string. Every such solution is better than
> 0:0:0 hack.
>
> I'll let Michael handle it further, as we discussed the issue
> broadly on IRC long time ago (and I was actully sure it was already
> included in GNU CP).
I wrote the attached patch to resolve this issue. Everybody okay with
it ?
Michael
2004-11-10 Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.ac: Use -release instead of -version-info for libtool.
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -r1.55 configure.ac
--- configure.ac 26 Oct 2004 20:26:03 -0000 1.55
+++ configure.ac 10 Nov 2004 14:49:18 -0000
@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@
dnl We will not track/change lib version until we reach version 1.0
dnl at which time we'll have to be more anal about such things
dnl -----------------------------------------------------------
-AC_SUBST(LIBVERSION, "0:0:0")
-CLASSPATH_MODULE="-module -version-info ${LIBVERSION} -no-undefined"
+CLASSPATH_MODULE="-module -release ${PACKAGE_VERSION} -no-undefined"
AC_SUBST(CLASSPATH_MODULE)
AC_PREREQ(2.59)
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
