Steven Augart wrote: > Jeroen Frijters wrote: > > Steven Augart wrote: > > > >>I received a suggestion in private mail from David Holmes > (who's been > >>generous with his time in discussing this with me) that we could > >>break up the initialization of java.lang.System into two > >>explicitly-invoked phases, and that a VM could optionally > >>request that the initialization be broken up, based on a > >>configuration setting. > >>I've asked him for permission to forward the full text of his > >>suggestion to the list. > >>I think that is the approach we will have to take. > > > > > > Isn't it about time that we consider my suggestion to > radically reduce > > the whole initialization ordering mess by moving everything into > > separate classes in the gnu.classpath.internal package? > > I haven't read over your suggestion yet (I haven't been following the > classpath list as closely as I should have for the past month or so), > but it does sound like a good idea. Obviously, with a release coming > out today, a temporary patch is probably a better idea, if it can be > squeezed in. > > And, to that end, I have the following small patch that makes > the current Classpath CVS head work with Jikes RVM. If someone > else approves it, I'll commit it.
It works fine for me. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
