>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> If this is the case, then is there a good reason for not Andrew> starting to include 1.5 changes, that will compile with Andrew> pre-1.5 compilers, into the HEAD branch? Andrew> * less problems with keeping generics in sync with the HEAD branch, Andrew> especially when the point of merging finally does arrive Actually, putting the new code on the trunk as well makes merging harder, not easier. That's because when it is put on the trunk all the generic bits must be stripped out, meaning that we'll have different versions of classes on the trunk and the branch. This probably isn't a severe problem, but I thought I'd mention it. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
