Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 17:19 schrieb Jeroen Frijters: > Michael Koch wrote: > > Good idea but wouldnt it be better to move all stuff from > > SystemProperties to VMSystemProperties to make the system > > properties fully customizable ? Perhaps some VM implements want > > to customize the properties more, e.g. add additional properties. > > I considered that, but I think it would be nicer if the common > properties stayed in the common code, but I can certainly see some > value in making the division a little more flexible. Maybe we > should have an additional call to VMSystemProperties at the end of > the initializer, to allow the VM to remove or modify the > properties?
But this needs a big fat comment so implementors find it. Michael -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
