Hi, On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:52 +0000, Robert Lougher wrote: > I notice that gij also uses uname, and gives i686 on an Athlon (at > least gij 3.4.2 does). I think it's a "no-brainer" -- if > applications depend on it, we need JDK behaviour and I'm changing > JamVM. Any opinions?
I think native code depending on this is broken since these values are not clearly defined for all platform/architecture type. And we should encourage developers to fix such code/build systems. (What if someone wants to compile such code on ia64, arm/xscale, mingw, sh-3/4, etc.) That said, this is what libgcj recently did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00382.html Note that for the various windows platforms there doesn't seem to be any consensus at the moment: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q1/msg00445.html Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
