>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roman> what is the status of the discussion of pre-GCJ4 support in GNU
Roman> Classpath. Should we still support GCJ3.4 ('s bugs)? I would vote for
Roman> switching to GCJ4 so that accessibility support in Swing can be
Roman> implemented.
I don't think we reached a conclusion.
I am in support of requiring gcj 4.0.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
