Jeroen Frijters writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Which is the Right Answer: the caller of baz *is* Frob. > > It *may* be the right answer, but how can you be certain that the > coder of class Foo intended this?
Ah, well that is a totally different matter. > IMNSHO, code like this is completely unauditable (remember, this > isn't just a correctness issue, access to class loaders is a > potential security issue). Of course, yes. But it's security issues that I'm concerned about here: what we want to know is the first caller of Foo.method() that is not Foo. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
