On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 12:15 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > I would like to propose that we fix these and mark the fixes with a > comment along the lines of 'CLASSPATH LOCAL', so that it is clear > where we've made changes. That way if/when we import new versions, we > will be able to see whether the change is still required. > > Comments?
Please coordinate this with upstream first then add a bug with as target the next release. Then we can just import the new upstream by the time we will do the next release. I would like to keep the number of local patches as small as possible, especially for these kind of minor non-showstopper buglets. And if any change to the upstream code base is made it has to be clearly documented in the relevant README so our users know exactly how we are different. Thanks, Mar
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
