Stuart> The current japi results show that the only non-minor error in the Stuart> top-level javax.swing package against 1.2 is that the constructor of Stuart> JEditorPaneAccessibleHypertextSupport
I love the description of this constructor in the online javadoc. Stuart> Basically, JEPAHS is a protected non-static inner class of JEditorPane Stuart> so the compiler translates the usual default no-argument constructor Stuart> into a constructor that takes a JEditorPane argument[1]. However, it Stuart> looks like javac makes that constructor public where gcj(?) is making Stuart> it protected. The rule is, a default constructor inherits the access of its class. I.E., 'protected' is correct here. So, we should just define our own public no-argument constructor here. Stuart> [1] Which raises another japi question: Should Japi automatically Stuart> remove these implicit arguments from nonstatic inner class Stuart> constructors so that its output matches what you'd actually put in Stuart> Java source? My gut feeling is yes, but I'm not sure exactly how to Stuart> detect them... Perhaps you can do it by noticing if the class has a synthetic 'this$0' field. This is the usual name for an 'outer this' reference, meaning that the class is not static. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
