On 12/22/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be enough if we could convince eclipse to accept a > "hand-made jre"? I mean one where you can you explicitly set the > individual binaries that make up the tools that eclipse expects? Plus > convincing the built-in eclipse compiler to use a flat (non-jar/zip) > bootclasspath? (I believe ecj can use dirs already, but haven't > checked.)
Yeah, I had the same thought, but not time yet to investigate a way to patch Eclipse, so that you can specify more details. It's definitely on my TODO list. Stephan Michels. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
