Casey Marshall wrote: > I'd prefer to keep ".in" files to a minimum. We could attain > the same thing by using reflection for the parts that may or > may not be available or are disabled at compile time.
I agree. At the moment it is possible to compile Classpath without using any of the build infrastructure, IMO we should aim to keep it that way. > Are there any opinions about adding test suites to Classpath? It > seems to me like that had been abandoned in favor of an > external test suite (Mauve). Mauve is definitely the place for tests. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
