On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 03:24:38PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Christian Thalinger wrote: > >On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 23:42 +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > >>Well, he hasn't yet, but I'll add my comment here. > >> > >>I'd like to see it as an unsigned int and not an int. Most systems I > >>know use unsigned int for socklen_t. Posix.1g also recommends to use > >>uint32_t for socklen_t. > > > >Well, on this very special OS not even uint32_t is defined. So i'd vote > >for `unsigned int' if you think we should use unsigned. > > That's fine with me. uint32_t is more or less 'unsigned int'. >
I'll try to wrap up a patch from Kaffe today that uses AX_CREATE_STDINT.m4 from ac-acrhive from Guido Draheim to declare those nice C99 types on compilers lacking them. It has served us well in Kaffe. :) That should make uint32_t available to any classpath code including the respective wrapper header. cheers, dalibor topic > Thanks, > Andreas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Classpath-patches mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
