In the compatibility charts, it is possible to find the following lines:
# class javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML.HTMLAccessibleContext:
missing in classpath
# class
javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML.IconElementInfo.IconAccessibleContext:
missing in classpath
# class
javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML.TableElementInfo.TableAccessibleContext:
missing in classpath
# class
javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML.TableElementInfo.TableAccessibleContext.AccessibleHeadersTable:
missing in classpath
# class
javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML.TextElementInfo.TextAccessibleContext:
missing in classpath
As it can be easily verified from the
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/ and
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/ ,
there are no such class as AccessibleHTML the official Sun's java API
standard. This is true for both 1.4 and 1.5 versions.
The public class with this name technically exists in the Sun's java
library. I think, it is likely that the class will appear in the
documentation of one of the future releases, 1.6 or probably even later.
I am not sure, if the implementation of such classes is inside the
current scope of the GNU Classpath project. Without looking into the
sources, I even do not know how should we do this. Does anybody ever
used this non trivial and totally undocumented class?
I would suggest to exclude javax.swing.text.html.AccessibleHTML from the
comparison charts. The simplest way to do this is to put the non
functional stub with this name, but containing the explaining comment.
Any opinions?
Audrius
