Hi Folks,

My diffs for mingw32 port have been mailed to classpath-patches.  I
believe that my mail is being held pending list-moderator approval due
to their heft.

Any questions or comments would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Chris

On 3/3/07, Chris Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tom,

I'm using configure.  My changes are based off of 0.93.  I haven't made
changes to any .java files yet (thanks for the heads-up), but I'll poke
around and see if I need to do so.

These are the changed or added files:

configure.ac

./include:
config.h
config.h.in
jni_md-x86-mingw32.h
jni_md.h

./examples:
Makefile.am

./lib:
Makefile.am

./native/jni/java-io:
java_io_VMFile.c

./native/jni/java-lang:
java_lang_VMProcess.c
java_lang_VMSystem.c

./native/jni/java-net:
gnu_java_net_VMPlainSocketImpl.c
gnu_java_net_local_LocalSocketImpl.c
java_net_VMInetAddress.c
java_net_VMNetworkInterface.c
java_net_VMURLConnection.c
javanet.c

./native/jni/java-nio:
 Makefile.am
gnu_java_nio_VMChannel.c
gnu_java_nio_VMPipe.c
gnu_java_nio_VMSelector.c
java_nio_MappedByteBufferImpl.c
javanio.h
mingw32_javanio.c

./native/jni/native-lib:
cpio.c
cpio.h
 cpnative.h
cpnet.c
cpnet.h
cpproc.c

./tools:
Makefile.am

Most of the changes are simply to allow compiling when WITHOUT_NETWORK is
defined.  The Makefile.am changes are to support using ';' as a path
separator instead of ':'.

I'll get started on the paperwork.

Thanks,
Chris


On 03 Mar 2007 09:01:15 -0700, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Chris> I have the first cut of a port to an exotic platform (non-POSIX).
>
> Cool.
>
> Chris> I'd like to investigate the possibility of getting my changes
> Chris> adopted into the project.  What's the best way to start that
> Chris> process?
>
> First thing is to get started on copyright assignment paperwork.
> Mark should probably do this but if he can't I will send you the form.
>
> Next is to start looking at how to merge it in.  It may be a little
> difficult since Classpath doesn't yet have native code for a non-POSIX
> port (afaik).  I'm sure we can figure out something sensible though.
>
> Maybe you could describe your port a bit more.  What files did you
> add, where did you put them, do you use configure, etc.
>
> A non-POSIX port may also need some .java changes.  ISTR a place or
> two where we have POSIX-y assumptions, like File or .so name mapping
> or something.
>
> Tom
>



Reply via email to