On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 19:26 +0200, Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > the OE guys still keep this little patch. Does anyone know if it is > correct and should be applied?
Hmm, maybe Michael knows... > --- classpath/native/fdlibm/ieeefp.h.orig 2006-04-14 > 22:33:09.000000000 -0400 > +++ classpath/native/fdlibm/ieeefp.h 2006-04-14 22:41:46.000000000 > -0400 > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > byte ordering was big or little endian depending upon the > target. > Modern floating-point formats are naturally ordered; in this case > __VFP_FP__ will be defined, even if soft-float. */ > -#ifdef __VFP_FP__ > +#ifdef __SOFTFP__ > #ifdef __ARMEL__ > #define __IEEE_LITTLE_ENDIAN > #else - twisti
