2010/12/8 Ivan Maidanski <iv...@mail.ru>:
> Hi Andrew and Pekka,
>
> Thank you Pekka but there are also some more ones (in June 2010):
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12989 (follow 
> the link in body to get classpath-ivmai-05.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12988 
> (classpath-ivmai-06.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12982 
> (classpath-ivmai-07.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12983 
> (classpath-ivmai-08.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12984 
> (classpath-ivmai-09.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12985 
> (classpath-ivmai-10.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12986 
> (classpath-ivmai-11.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12991 
> (classpath-ivmai-12-v3.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12972 
> (classpath-ivmai-14.diff, discussed in 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/12975).
>
> classpath-ivmai-13.diff has just been reviewed by Andrew.
>
> And, here is the unprocessed ones listed by Pekka:
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006438.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-15.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006439.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-16.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006440.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-17.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006441.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-18.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006442.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-19.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006443.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-20.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006444.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-21.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006445.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-22.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006446.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-23.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006447.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-24.diff);
> - 
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-June/006448.html
>  (classpath-ivmai-25.diff);
>
> And, some more unprocessed ones posted in July:
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13009 
> (classpath-ivmai-26.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13010 
> (classpath-ivmai-27.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13011 
> (classpath-ivmai-28.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13012 
> (classpath-ivmai-29.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13013 
> (classpath-ivmai-30.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13015 
> (classpath-ivmai-31.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13016 
> (classpath-ivmai-32.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13018 
> (classpath-ivmai-33.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13020 
> (classpath-ivmai-34.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13021 
> (classpath-ivmai-35.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13022 
> (classpath-ivmai-36.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13023 
> (classpath-ivmai-37.diff).
>
> and, the recently published ones (and discussed with Pekka):
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13052 
> (classpath-ivmai-38.diff);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13056 
> (classpath-ivmai-39.diff, the test case provided turned out to be irrelevant 
> to the patch provided as discussed in the thread 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13078);
> - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.classpath.patches/13058 
> (classpath-ivmai-40.diff, just adds the test case for 
> classpath-ivmai-33.diff).
>
> I really apologies for such huge amount of patches posted :(
>

Don't! We should be the ones apologising for not reviewing them sooner.

> Regards.
>
> Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:32:20 +0200 Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org>:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> There's also 10-15 patches from Ivan sitting in the archives
>> >
>> > Hmm, I had seen some discussion around those and thought they were being
>> > addressed.  Bring them on!
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is all of it but it's a start anyway:
>>  ...
>
>
>



-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

Reply via email to