Hi all,

I started hacking on invokedynamic again:

https://github.com/penberg/classpath/commit/21c457f4928678bb5709dfc5a992b80f0d02c4b8

https://github.com/penberg/jato/commits/indy

I'm planning to use ASM for generating bytecode for method handle
chains. Does that sound like a reasonable thing to do? We already
carry the ASM code under tools/external/asm/. Can I just move that
under external/ and rename the package so that it doesn't clash with
the upstream project?

                        Pekka

Reply via email to