90%+ of the chips being shipped today are 64-bit chips (Core 2 Duo, Pentium D, among others)
Michael Stanclift Network Analyst Rockhurst University Conway Hall, Office 415 1100 Rockhurst Road Kansas City, Missouri 64110 (816) 501-4231 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joey Mavity Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CCAA running Checks? Version 4.1.2.1. I think I've "resolved" the problem: Don't run 32 bit Vista on top of a 64 bit chip. Or something...had to give it back to the customer, though, so still troubleshooting this joy. ________________________________ From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CCAA running Checks? Joey, What CCA version? That looks like a bad preconfigured rule. I am running 4.1.1, so I need to whitelist 64-bit L Bruce Osborne Liberty University From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joey Mavity Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [CLEANACCESS] CCAA running Checks? According to Cisco documentation at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/support_guide/srv rhw.html, Clean Access only supports authentication on 64-bit OS Windows. Yet I have a Windows Vista Home Premium 64 machine failing on: Failed Checks: pc_vista64, Registry Check [\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wow6432Node\ exists ] pc_KB941644_1_MS08-001_Vista, File Check [$SYSTEM_32\tcpipcfg.dll later than [C]01/07/2008 00:00:00] Any idea why this is happening? --Joey Mavity Azusa Pacific University
