Justin,

Unfortunately not, it has to time out - we can't manually remove something from that list.

That being said, that means we are getting traffic from that MAC/IP combo. Do you have a duplicate IP on the network?

Nate

Justin Howell wrote:
Ah ok now there's something interesting. The arp table has a different MAC than 
the dhcp.leases file for that IP address. Is there a way to manually delete an 
ARP entry?

Justin Howell
Telecommunications Network Technician
Solano Community College

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Weird Dead IP Problem

Justin,

It could be some sort of an arp issue or something similar. You said
that the traffic doesn't make it past the CAS, does it make it to the
CAS? Can you run a capture on the untrusted port of the CAS and verify
if we see the traffic there? If so, then I would definitely say its a
CAS problem.

Check the CAS arp table too: cat /proc/click/intern_arpq/table - do you
see the offending IP in there with the correct MAC address and Vlan tag?

Nate

Justin Howell wrote:
Hi Max,

I've done some sniffs and traffic does not seem to make it past the
CAS. I see the requests leave the client but they don't seem to go
anywhere, like the CAS is not passing them. I'm planning on doing more
sniffs to try and find out what's going on, just haven't gotten to
them yet.

Another strange wrinkle ... the previous 'bad' IP addresses we had
excluded ... just for kicks, I hard-coded those to a couple of clients
and now they both work perfectly fine. How bizarre. So we get an
occasional bad IP, but it doesn't stay bad forever. That's sounding
more and more like a conflict ...

*Justin Howell*

/Telecommunications Network Technician///

Solano Community College

*From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Caines, Max
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:18 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Weird Dead IP Problem

Hi Justin

Have you tried sniffing the network to see what's happening at layer
2? For example, are name lookups working on the client? If no, does
the DNS server see them and respond? If yes, does the CAS see the HTTP
requests and what happens to its responses?

Regards

*Max Caines
IT Services, University of Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV1 1SB
Tel: 01902 322245 Fax: 01902 322777*

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Justin Howell
    *Sent:* 01 April 2008 16:50
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* [CLEANACCESS] Weird Dead IP Problem

    OK, here's a strange one, maybe someone's seen this. Our original
    CAS setup was one managed subnet, class C, 172.16.6.0/24 to be
    exact. Real IP Gateway, In-Band deployment. The untrusted
    interface of the CAS and default route for the managed subnet was
    172.16.6.1. Over the past two yeara, we would suddenly come up
    with a computer that would pull a particular IP, and with that IP,
    could not communicate with the CAS or any part of the network; it
    was like the IP was blacklisted or in conflict. DNS would not
    resolve; if I put in the IP of the CAS, I could get to the login
    portal, but when I tried to download the agent, it would timeout.
    No other network resources could be accessed, even those allowed
    by the unauthenticated role. Cisco of course blamed our network,
    that it was an IP problem on our network. Their solution was to
    break the managed subnet into two chunks, and exclude the
    offending IP. The computer would finally pull a different IP, and
    all would be well.

    The problem is, this problem keeps happening. It's currently
    broken into three different subnet chunks. And now this morning,
    we've got another IP that is not communicating with the CAS. The
    problem is, with every new chunk made, it requires its own default
    gateway; the CAS DHCP pages do not allow me to reuse the existing
    gateway. So each 'bad' IP we've got to exclude results in losing
    it and another IP for a gateway from our pool. We've got enough
    IPs for the moment, but this is getting annoying.

    We have another DHCP server for clients not on Clean Access, but
    it does not have a pool for the 172.16.6.0 subnet, so
    theoretically the only way this problem could be caused by an IP
    conflict would be a user on that subnet hard-coding an address.
    But they would still be on the clean access subnet, still have to
    authenticate/remediate, so I should see them on Users page or the
    event logs.

    Any one seen this? Or have suggestions? Cisco was not very helpful
    last time I called ("Just make two subnets - that IP problem is
    your problem not Clean Access's") so I'm hesitant to open another
    TAC and spend my week on the phone.

    *Justin Howell*

    /Telecommunications Network Technician/

    Solano Community College

    (707) 864-7205

Reply via email to