We used to have our own custom checks for XP SP3 and Vista SP1. When the Cisco preconfigured checks are available, we switched to them and we haven't seen any problems with them.
Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Diggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:51:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: XP SP3 question again Just to clarify, are Cisco's preconfigured rules now correctly checking patch levels for both XP SP3 and Vista SP1? I still have my work around in place. If true, are there any minimum software version requirements for the servers or agent? I'm running 4.1.2.0. -Mike On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote: > On recent Clean Access, the preconfigured rules already support SP3 > patches. Am I misunderstanding the question? > > > > Bruce Osborne > > Liberty University > > > > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Sean > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [CLEANACCESS] XP SP3 question again > > > > Hi all - > > > > I'm setting up the rules to support SP3 on our network and I'm managing > to confuse myself. Do I remove the SP2 rule entirely? If I do and make > SP3 optional (to start with) will that allow users with neither onto my > network? If anyone has tips on how they deployed this, I'd appreciate > the sharing of them. > > > > I know this is a rather elementary question but I spend so much time on > the other side of NAC that I've managed to completely forget most of the > rule parameters... > > > > - Sean > > > > ---- > > Sean Hennessey > > Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator > > The University of Portland > > _________________________________________ Mike Diggins Voice: 905.525.9140 Ext. 27471 Network Analyst, Enterprise Networks FAX: 905.528.3773 University Technology Services E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
