Hi Ryan Yes, we've been using this type of check for about 18 months now. We use it precisely because we had so many problems with the Cisco checks. That isn't a criticism - just that the logic WUA uses is so complex that disagreements are almost inevitable. The only systems on which we get the non-admin problem are some laptops which are loaned to students by our Learning Centre. On those we have installed the helper (stub), so they work OK. We have _never_ seen a student-owned PC used with a non-admin account. If we did, we'd just get them to install the helper
Regards Max Caines IT Services, University of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV1 1SB Tel: 01902 322245 Fax: 01902 322777 > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richter, Ryan > Sent: 07 April 2009 17:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] Windows Update Services Requirement > > Does anyone use the type of requirement Mike is testing > successfully in residence halls? Our number one problem with > CCA is the Cisco checks and Windows Update disagreeing on > whether or not a machine has all necessary updates. We have > workarounds in place, but the prospect of just making Windows > Update the authority on whether or not a client has all > updates is very interesting to me.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
