Folks, I have an update on the 4.6 release. We are planning on releasing 4.6 on Cisco.com by tomorrow instead of July 7th.
Thanks -Alok -----Original Message----- From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: NAC3350 Awesome! Thanks for the info guys! --Jeremy On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:12, Alok Agrawal (alagrawa)<[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Curt, > Its out. The new agent with 4.6 has a service component to it and hence will > not need the stub agent anymore. > > Regards > -Alok > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Curt McDaniel > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NAC3350 > > Will that still have a Stub Installer requirement for computers without admin > rights or is that finally out? > > Curt McDaniel Washington State Patrol > > > Curt McDaniel > Network Security > -------------------------- > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon Jun 29 20:55:29 2009 > Subject: Re: NAC3350 > > Hey Jeremy, > We're planning on releasing 4.6 the week of July 7th. > > Thanks > -Alok > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NAC3350 > > Word on the street was 4.6 was coming out soon. I'm not sure if anyone > from Cisco can give us a timeline but maybe that would help you out. > > No one else has brought it up....but you could provide the 4.1.10 > client to your users that need it and still use 4.5 on the appliances. > That is unless it's what you run on the majority of you're machine and > in that case that might be a PITA. When it comes to picking versions I > like look at the features of the versions I'm choosing between. If 4.5 > offers something you need then maybe working out the SAV issue is > something worth looking into. > > The 4.1.x series is also EOL as of July 15, 2010 and after that only > the 4.5 version or greater are going to be supported on the > appliances. > > --Jeremy > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 17:48, Pastor, Richard<[email protected]> wrote: >> Ken, >> >> >> >> I would only suggest you to stay away from 4.5.0.0. It not only has the >> problems with Norton, but also with Vista in combination with any Symantec >> AV product. Thanks for the info on 4.1.10. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Richard Pastor >> >> Information Technology Services >> >> The John Marshall Law School >> >> >> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:37 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: NAC3350 >> >> >> >> Hi Richard: >> >> >> >> The release notes for 4.1.10 agent have some newer AV versions than 4.5.1 >> and Cisco removed some AV versions from 4.5.1 >> >> Doug Chudzik posted this info about Norton 16.5 not working with 4.1.8 agent >> and others also complained about Norton 16, so I assume there is a problem >> with 4.5.1. We also need free AVG 8.5 detection as well, ok with 4.1.10 >> (posted by Isabelle Graham) not with 4.5.1. >> >> >> >> I would like to know what version (4.1.8 or 4.5.1) other NAC administrators >> are using for comparison. >> >> >> >> Ken >> >> >> >> >> >>>Someone from Cisco emailed me and I tested the trial version of Norton >>> Internet Security 2009 (16.5) here, and it does indeed >work with the 4.1.10 >>> Agent. It failed in the 4.1.8 Agent. >> >>> >> >>>On Symantec's website they want you to give a credit card to download the >>> trial, but I found a copy on Softpedia that doesn't >require any info since >>> they have it mirrored: >>> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/Norton-Internet-Security.shtml >> >>> >> >>>Doug Chudzik >> >>>ResNet Manager >> >>>Wellesley College >> >> >> >>>==== >> >>>I've just started testing with the 4.1.10 agent and it looks like it >>> supports AVG 8.5 free at least. >> >>>I don't have a copy of NIS 2009 to test with unfortunately. >> >>> >> >>>---- >> >>>Isabelle Graham >> >>>Information Security >> >>>American University >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ***************************************** >> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217 >> Networks and Systems >> Dalhousie University >> Halifax, N.S, Canada >> E-mail [email protected] >> ***************************************** >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pastor, Richard >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:16 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: NAC3350 >> >> >> >> Ken, >> >> We have 4.1.8/4.5, and definitely have the problems you describe. Last >> Wednesday, I submitted my whines to the group, but haven't received any >> replies to this point. Do you have reason to believe that agent 4.1.10.0 >> would be better? >> >> >> >> >> >> Richard Pastor >> >> Information Technology Services >> >> The John Marshall Law School >> >> >> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:34 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: NAC3350 >> >> >> >> Hello all: >> >> >> >> We have just required two NAC3350 servers and I am tying to decide to use >> 4.1.8 with agent 4.1.10.0 or 4.5.1. 4.5.1 appears scary with its AVG and >> Norton detection problems and some open caveats. Any feedback would be >> helpful. >> >> >> >> Thanks, Ken >> >> >> >> ***************************************** >> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217 >> Networks and Systems >> Dalhousie University >> Halifax, N.S, Canada >> E-mail [email protected] >> ***************************************** >> >> >
